I like both (Rolex Sports only, and PAM Luminors only) for different reasons, some of them listed above, but primarily because both have very iconic looks that other brands only wish they have. Showcase 2 of my loves...
Of late, I find myself veering towards the PAM. For the larger size, for the ability to mix and match the look using different straps to suit different occasions. But I still give my Rolex wrist time at least once a week cos it just goes with any attire I'm in!
Personally, I find the arguments for or against Pam vs Rolex based on the point on movement (in-house vs modified ETA) a little futile (dun flame me ah, just MHO). I recall, in the not too distant past, Daytona has to rely on Zenith's El Primero movement, where as PAM's innovation is more on the sturdy casing and large (easy to read, glow in the dark) dials that suited Italian Navy. Some vintage Pams even relied on Rolex movements!
I reckon both Rolex and Pam are not trying to pretend they are a true blue manufacture (like JLC, Zenith, VC, etc). Having said that, both brands have taken steps to up the ante and do movements themselves, for some, if not all models. I don't think I will ever see a Rolex with 8 days power reserve or Tourbillon movement, cos that's not what they position themselves to be.
Both try to use their history to their advantage. Yes, Rolex is a bigger brother, but PAM is coming up, that explains in our humble ROC forum, there is a dedicated thread to buy & sell Pams. And the very fact that this thread was even started supports my point. Have a good day folks
Of late, I find myself veering towards the PAM. For the larger size, for the ability to mix and match the look using different straps to suit different occasions. But I still give my Rolex wrist time at least once a week cos it just goes with any attire I'm in!
Personally, I find the arguments for or against Pam vs Rolex based on the point on movement (in-house vs modified ETA) a little futile (dun flame me ah, just MHO). I recall, in the not too distant past, Daytona has to rely on Zenith's El Primero movement, where as PAM's innovation is more on the sturdy casing and large (easy to read, glow in the dark) dials that suited Italian Navy. Some vintage Pams even relied on Rolex movements!
I reckon both Rolex and Pam are not trying to pretend they are a true blue manufacture (like JLC, Zenith, VC, etc). Having said that, both brands have taken steps to up the ante and do movements themselves, for some, if not all models. I don't think I will ever see a Rolex with 8 days power reserve or Tourbillon movement, cos that's not what they position themselves to be.
Both try to use their history to their advantage. Yes, Rolex is a bigger brother, but PAM is coming up, that explains in our humble ROC forum, there is a dedicated thread to buy & sell Pams. And the very fact that this thread was even started supports my point. Have a good day folks
Comment