To clear up some misunderstandings, the watches posted in this thread (except the photo of Omega, LV and Exp II) all belong to my father-in-law who is not registered in this forum. mrchan took the photos from watchbus.com, where my father-in-law is an active member of, and posted them here.
I personally think that my father-in-law would not mind sharing the photos with fellow watch lovers, but mrchan's replies implied that those watches belong to him shows a sign of dishonesty.
mrchan also started another thread with a Daytona collection, and his replies also implied that they belong to him, but in fact they do not: http://www.sg-roc.com/showthread.php?t=9671
Ok I get what you mean bro.
Sorry about the misunderstanding caused,I hope your father-in-law would understand.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
I am joechen99 from watchbus.com
I am not mrchan in sg-roc.com
So mrchan ... ???
this is embarrassing. only mrchan will know why he did what he did.
in any case, I hope you and the true owner of the watches featured understand that we are all watch lovers here (esp. rolexes) and naturally admired the watches that were shown but do not condone in anyway what mrchan had done...
"Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence,
three times is enemy action and
over 600 is clearly the work of an ancient Sumerian demon or some sh*t."
Comment