Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My new PAM 312

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by wolfeyes1974 View Post
    there're only 4 ways to go for all products (not just watches):

    1. play with design
    2. play with materials
    3. play with movements (for watches)
    4. play with history (relaunch "old" products)

    as long as they do any of these, new movements or not for watches, consumers have to pay a premium for it..homages will soon follow suit given the technology and know-how..this is a reality!

    now that all major watchmakers are going inhouse or use selita movements, will ETA be another lemania in the future? demand for it leading to higher price for the watches using ETAs (last batch or not) because of its rarity?

    ETA is a common movement now but it's one of the most reliable around actually... by the way, pam's so called inhouse movement is still an outsource movement and they charge a higher price for it (consolation: most of us buy watches because they sing to us and we admire their history)..read this:

    VALFleurier

    One obvious question that begs to be answered is: If all of Panerai’s movements are hand assembled in Neuchatel, where do the components for these movements come from? The answer to this question points to an even greater manufacturing depth embodied by Panerai and the Richemont Group.
    Fleurier is a small Swiss city at the base of the Jura mountains that, historically, has been an epicenter for the most refined horological crafts.





    The Quartz Crisis hit Fleurier particularly hard during the late ’70s and early ’80s; but in the mid-’90s, the region became reborn as a result of the renewed interest in mechanical watchmaking and the establishment of manufactures such as Parmigiani Fleurier and Chopard L.U.C. The latest and perhaps most impressive addition to Fleurier is ValFleurier, a sprawling industrial complex boasting some of the most advanced manufacturing technology in the world. Panerai’s management had determined that it would be pointless to create in-house calibers that were, in turn, reliant on specialist suppliers for plates, bridges or gear wheels. As the Richemont-owned ValFleurier evolved, it has logically begun to produce parts for many of the Group’s other brands, but it is obvious that both the existence of ValFleurier and the massive new facility being built adjacent to it are directly related to Panerai’s rise in status to a true manufacture.





    Says Angelo Bonati, “ValFleurier began working just for Panerai, and then the Group saw the benefit to servicing other brands as well. But that is great for us, because the more there is a spirit of innovation there, the more we all benefit. Also, I would humbly say that because we were involved very early in ValFleurier, we communicated a spirit of how we work to the entire manufacture. We work with enthusiasm and passion; otherwise, you cannot realize your dream and you will not be satisfied. The best results can only come from the personal motivation of human beings, and this is innately linked to having pride in what you do.”





    What ValFleurier is capable of achieving in terms of specialized parts is simply staggering. A look into the highly specialized movement factory reveals its unique abilities, such as rendering the complex parts for the clutch in the P.2004 or the tourbillon in the P.2005. The implication of the creative freedom that this will provide in Panerai’s future is major. For example, Panerai’s P.2005 tourbillon represents a total revolution in the world of tourbillon wristwatches, yet it would have been totally unachievable without the ability to render many of the specialized parts used within, such as the toothed conical element that replaces the fixed fourth wheel of a normal tourbillon. Says Bonati, “ValFleurier is inextricably linked with the future of Panerai.”
    Mmm..now I know..Thanks bro for the information

    Comment


    • #47
      There's a local seller for a PAM 312 BNIB for SGD9900 at the *** forum going for $9900 which is only $50 above list price!..anybody interested and couldn't wait quickly grab it now
      __________________

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Andrew Tay
        best is wait for the demand to die off......next yr i buy from hour glass can get 10% to 15% off.....
        patience must be one of your greatest virtue..

        Comment


        • #49
          patience and focus...

          Originally posted by dennlow View Post
          patience must be one of your greatest virtue..

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by 116520 View Post
            patience and focus...
            Mmm..need to learn from you guys cos patience was never my virtue..

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Andrew Tay
              best is wait for the demand to die off......next yr i buy from hour glass can get 10% to 15% off.....

              Can i tag along???
              Rolex SD "m" series
              Omega Speedmaster
              PAM 164K

              Comment


              • #52
                BTW, is there any other current PAM models that are selling at a premium too?

                Originally posted by Andrew Tay
                best is wait for the demand to die off......next yr i buy from hour glass can get 10% to 15% off.....

                Comment


                • #53
                  i think a handful e.g. 292... 26k
                  the hype is true. listen at your own risk.
                  visit my watch and audio blog oohlins.blogspot & learn how to use the rolex comfort link

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    I have tested my PAM 312 on the 72 hrs power reserve and am pleased to report that after winding the watch 200 turns (hopefully not overwind), the watch manage to tick for 78 hrs and 40 mins b4 it came to a complete stop...would luv to know from any of our bros who have tested the same watch their timing..

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Nice!

                      Originally posted by dennlow View Post
                      I have tested my PAM 312 on the 72 hrs power reserve and am pleased to report that after winding the watch 200 turns (hopefully not overwind), the watch manage to tick for 78 hrs and 40 mins b4 it came to a complete stop...would luv to know from any of our bros who have tested the same watch their timing..

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by dennlow View Post
                        I have tested my PAM 312 on the 72 hrs power reserve and am pleased to report that after winding the watch 200 turns (hopefully not overwind), the watch manage to tick for 78 hrs and 40 mins b4 it came to a complete stop...would luv to know from any of our bros who have tested the same watch their timing..

                        Wow! Great.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Tks for the update. It is good to know that your watch is working well.

                          BTY< I normally wind approx 20 to 30 rounds for all my watches, is this too little?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            itz always the case for those who decide not to wait... a frnd paid almost S$10K for a GMT2C wh it was released a few yrs back... now can get forvS$7K+...

                            Originally posted by wolfeyes1974 View Post
                            alas, there're some who paid a premium for 312 because they couldn't wait...

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by senmin View Post
                              Tks for the update. It is good to know that your watch is working well.

                              BTY< I normally wind approx 20 to 30 rounds for all my watches, is this too little?
                              No, it's fine.
                              The Crown Of Achievement

                              Comment


                              • #60


                                I agree that the 312's price will eventually soften , to me I would rather save up more and go for a 233. On the other hand the 312 does serve to be a good value for money in-house Pam and probably will displace the position of the 104 as the most practical Pam to get.

                                In-regards to the issue of the ETA, do note that ETA's notice is that they will stop supply of base movements and will only sell movements as a whole which means to say that for many houses this may no longer be a cost effective approach. In Omega's situation(who's well known models are usually equipped with Lemania with the entry level pcs housing ETAs/Valjoux), they got a little stuck as Swatch decided to use Lemania almost exclusively for Breguet and renamed it as Breguet Manufacture. But the joint venture with George Daniels on the Co-Axial has gaven them a good way out.

                                Also, a movement may not be completely made in-house for it to be considered a manufacture, as long as the movement is commissioned and solely design for one party, it can be considered so, one such example is the LUC by Chopard which is designed and made by Parmigiani.

                                Comment

                                Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

                                Collapse

                                Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X