Then there's the ncg JB, big crown, Bart gilt, pcg, pre-comex, maxi loliilop dials......nicknames coined by dealers to lend a sort of exotic rarity kind of name to jack the prices up. That's another story.
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The charm of a '60s Submariner
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by garis View PostMF dial that's period correct to the case serial would definitely command more than a FF that's period correct, but not much more, if it's a matte dial. I would rather pay premium for a period correct FF 5513 with a pristine dial and mature patina lume plots than a tired looking MF 5513. That said, some earlier MF lume plots, especially the first batch around 66-67, comes with a mixture of tritium lume compound that still glows green for a short while if exposed to a strong source of light. Many has mistaken this as a sign of the markers being relumed but it's not. Then, the lume in earlier batch of 5513 MF dials are applied thickly in such a way that it's 'fat and raised', like a small mound. Many has since disintegrated and powdered away leaving the dial looking pocked marked. It is only the last batch of MF dials from 68-70 and then FF that Rolex started to lessen the lume compound and stabilized the plots. That's why most of the FF 5513 plots still stays intact till this very day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gunbucker View PostThanks, this explains a lot. There was a MF (getting used to the lingo now!) 5513 that I passed up, because like you said, the hour markers looked like expired medicine pills that have shrunked, chipped off, and hollowed unevenly. The reason I got this one was to have something with a nice patina...“Watches, no matter how much they cost, are better at telling time than making a person happy.†- Thomas J. Stanley
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment