Well I am in my early 30s but i still like the look of vintage rolex. It has a very cool factor to it. The crystal looks a lot better than ones uses these days. Modern design looks very to date with new materials and new looks. But vintage has this nice feel to it. The vintage i have is even older than myself!
vintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz
Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
vintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz
Old style plexi glass is not difficult to find, just head down to ebronzeage or tophour and you can find it with ease. And especially when aftermarket crystals are made exact to the OEM specs, I don't find it a problem. When I send in a vintage rolex to RSC for verification, I have never once seen the technician inspect the plexiglass.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
--Groucho Marx--
*For faster response, pls direct all questions to my email: [email protected]thanks!
Old style plexi glass is not difficult to find, just head down to ebronzeage or tophour and you can find it with ease. And especially when aftermarket crystals are made exact to the OEM specs, I don't find it a problem. When I send in a vintage rolex to RSC for verification, I have never once seen the technician inspect the plexiglass.
For some...well they feel that vintage watches are in a sense less common and more rare in the market.
Back 30 years ago...Rolex production is not like today's 800,000 watches a year. Maybe it could be 100,000 a year. Which makes their production(supply) lower. With the new professional series being more popular, people who want to stand out from the crowd would prefer vintage pieces. That beside the point, some vintage watches have more meaning to some and hav some historic value in some cases.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Strange but I see some comments of vintage being expensive. Unless you go for the rare red sub, I don't think vintage piece being much more expensive than current sports models.
A GMT2C is around the 9K region. Most vintage GMT and Sun cost less.....
Last edited by lthg25; 30-07-09, 11:39 AM.
Reason: gammer
My Current
Rolex Daytona 116515
Rolex Submariner 16610
Rolex Submariner 116610
Rolex Date 1550
IWC Spitfire Chronograph 371705
IWC Portuguese 7 Days 500107
Omega Ocean Planet 22015000
Bell & Ross Heritage BR126
Grand Seiko GMT SBGM021
Seiko Sumo SBDC001
Seiko Sumo SBDC003
Seiko Marinemaster SBDX012
Seiko Brightz SDGZ013 Chronograph
Strange but I see some comments of vintage being expensive. Unless you go for the rare red sub, I don't think vintage piece being much more expensive than current sports models.
A GMT2C is around the 9K region. Most vintage GMT and Sun cost less.....
Well..we cannot compare it like this...
I would compare those of the same era with it...so we are comparing on the same line.
Vintage Datejust compared to Vintage Daytona. Datejust is valued at ard 2.8k-3k now...while Daytona is about 30k.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
wait till u see the price for a full set excellent pepsi dial 1675 vintage gmt's price or a rootbeer gmt
Btw gmtiic ss released somewhere in 2008. Price has been falling. Bow 8k nw can get. Vintage on the other hand rises. Hence ur comparison on the gmt not really correct
Comment