Originally posted by feilong108
View Post
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Vintage?
Collapse
X
-
Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
-
Originally posted by lthg25 View PostWell I am in my early 30s but i still like the look of vintage rolex. It has a very cool factor to it. The crystal looks a lot better than ones uses these days. Modern design looks very to date with new materials and new looks. But vintage has this nice feel to it. The vintage i have is even older than myself!Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
Comment
-
Originally posted by zidaneong View Postvintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianz"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
--Groucho Marx--
*For faster response, pls direct all questions to my email: destro22bt@gmail.com thanks!
Comment
-
Originally posted by zidaneong View Postvintage is nice, but i prefer s. crystal as i might damage the plastic crystal. Like my dad, have a small chip off from his 1500. sianzI dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........
Comment
-
Originally posted by Destro22BT View PostOld style plexi glass is not difficult to find, just head down to ebronzeage or tophour and you can find it with ease. And especially when aftermarket crystals are made exact to the OEM specs, I don't find it a problem. When I send in a vintage rolex to RSC for verification, I have never once seen the technician inspect the plexiglass.Originally posted by exxondus View Postif its s. crytal, the impact that caused a small chip off his 1500 may shatter your s.crytalOriginally posted by feilong108 View Posttrue..and s.crystal is much more costlier to replace...hahaha....plexi rules!!!Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
Comment
-
Originally posted by psee View PostPersonally I do not have any vintage watches in my current collection but I supposed their 'uniqueness' do appeal to some collectors?Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
Comment
-
For some...well they feel that vintage watches are in a sense less common and more rare in the market.
Back 30 years ago...Rolex production is not like today's 800,000 watches a year. Maybe it could be 100,000 a year. Which makes their production(supply) lower. With the new professional series being more popular, people who want to stand out from the crowd would prefer vintage pieces. That beside the point, some vintage watches have more meaning to some and hav some historic value in some cases.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
when u have 1 feet in the coffin, you start to remember the good old times and hope to have a piece of your era with you.
okok jking....cos production of those models is much less than the modern ones bah so highly collectable....
or buyer is just too darn richI dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........
Comment
-
Vintage more expensive?
Strange but I see some comments of vintage being expensive. Unless you go for the rare red sub, I don't think vintage piece being much more expensive than current sports models.
A GMT2C is around the 9K region. Most vintage GMT and Sun cost less.....My Current
Rolex Daytona 116515
Rolex Submariner 16610
Rolex Submariner 116610
Rolex Date 1550
IWC Spitfire Chronograph 371705
IWC Portuguese 7 Days 500107
Omega Ocean Planet 22015000
Bell & Ross Heritage BR126
Grand Seiko GMT SBGM021
Seiko Sumo SBDC001
Seiko Sumo SBDC003
Seiko Marinemaster SBDX012
Seiko Brightz SDGZ013 Chronograph
Comment
-
Originally posted by lthg25 View PostStrange but I see some comments of vintage being expensive. Unless you go for the rare red sub, I don't think vintage piece being much more expensive than current sports models.
A GMT2C is around the 9K region. Most vintage GMT and Sun cost less.....
I would compare those of the same era with it...so we are comparing on the same line.
Vintage Datejust compared to Vintage Daytona. Datejust is valued at ard 2.8k-3k now...while Daytona is about 30k.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
Comparing with....
I point is if you can afford a new GMT2C which cost 9k, a vintage GMT will cost less. Hence why is vintage said to be expensive?
A new Sub cost around the same as a vintage sub, not talking about red sub....
A new justdate cost even more than a vintage piece.....My Current
Rolex Daytona 116515
Rolex Submariner 16610
Rolex Submariner 116610
Rolex Date 1550
IWC Spitfire Chronograph 371705
IWC Portuguese 7 Days 500107
Omega Ocean Planet 22015000
Bell & Ross Heritage BR126
Grand Seiko GMT SBGM021
Seiko Sumo SBDC001
Seiko Sumo SBDC003
Seiko Marinemaster SBDX012
Seiko Brightz SDGZ013 Chronograph
Comment
-
wait till u see the price for a full set excellent pepsi dial 1675 vintage gmt's price or a rootbeer gmt
Btw gmtiic ss released somewhere in 2008. Price has been falling. Bow 8k nw can get. Vintage on the other hand rises. Hence ur comparison on the gmt not really correct
Originally posted by lthg25 View PostI point is if you can afford a new GMT2C which cost 9k, a vintage GMT will cost less. Hence why is vintage said to be expensive?
A new Sub cost around the same as a vintage sub, not talking about red sub....
A new justdate cost even more than a vintage piece.....I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment