I also got a few colleagues who wear rolex in the office. Ask them what series, they also dunno. They thought X series is newer than A series... not!
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
worth to buy? 16610LV F series Mark II dial at 8.7k in very good condition
Collapse
X
-
kindly note that if you are making inquiry on a watch sales, please use pm if the thread(in this case) is not in the garage section. this is to ensure that the thread does not go OTif you have issues with your account, click here for self help and read forum rules here. 90% of your answers can be found in Forum FAQ
i DO NOT respond to any pm regarding account issues
kindly email with- subject heading indicating your issue
- your nick
- your corresponding email address
- state what you were trying to do and what the system prevented you to do
if you receive no response in pm or email, it means your answers can be found in the Forum FAQ here
your kind understanding is very much appreciated.
disclaimer : all opinions expressed are personal
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by KuchingKu View PostF series is considered 2004 watch. That's why the Y series mark 1 is still considered the true 50 anniversary LV. Also, I used to have 2 of these.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shou.biao.kuang View PostFrom my understanding, some of the early F series are considered by collectors as the 'true' 50th anniversary model too. They display the same traits as the late Y series.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KuchingKu View PostPeople can consider anything. 2003 was 50th anniversary for submariner. Y series to F (before 40000) have Same features etc. However, given a choice for both, anyone will take the Y. It is claimed that less than 400 pieces of Y LV exist. True or not only Rolex know.
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment