Was removing the stickers on the clasp earlier and found the inside of the double clip disappointing. Didn't notice it previously, the inside of the double clip was grey and rough. When compare to DSSD, DSSD have a much better finishing.
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Slight disappointment with the Sub C clasp finishing
Collapse
X
-
I have the same type of clasp for my GMT2C and I find it quite nice. The sandblasted finish is not a result of poor workmanship/quality but an intended design. It might also serve a purpose of differentiating the clasp/bracelet of different models or series...I don't really know.
Such combination of polished + sandblasted metals is quite common on accessories such as rings and bracelets.Watches are like potato chips - You never stop at one
Never political, seldom diplomatic, always honest
-
Originally posted by pegasi View PostI have the same type of clasp for my GMT2C and I find it quite nice. The sandblasted finish is not a result of poor workmanship/quality but an intended design. It might also serve a purpose of differentiating the clasp/bracelet of different models or series...I don't really know.
Such combination of polished + sandblasted metals is quite common on accessories such as rings and bracelets.
Comment
-
Originally posted by uglybaba View PostBro, I was referring to the inside of the double clip, is GMTIIC the same?
Watches are like potato chips - You never stop at one
Never political, seldom diplomatic, always honest
Comment
-
Just saw a article on the differences between Sub C and ExII/ GMTIIC, not sure if the double clip is the same for both clasps.
http://www.minus4plus6.com/glidelock.htm
Anyone with Sub C can help take a photo of your double clip?
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment