Submariner or GMT-II

[raverus]

If both comes at the same price i would rather go for the GMT master 2! Looks more flashy!

[Mugen81]

GMT for sure...

[azzurri]

GMT for me too. Better if it's a vintage piece

I too have gone through the "struggle" of deciding whether to go for the GMT or Sub. Ultimately, I decided to look for a GMT simply because it's the watch that got me interested in Rolex. But weirdly enough, a Rolex that I still don't own hopefully I can find a reasonably priced vintage one soon

[Railgun]

Sub for the sporty ones !

[watchorigin]

Sub is just too common. GMT is preferred buy I will go for Daytona as price is really good now. Its a iconic piece as well.

[profzhu]

get both hahahaha. i did.

[skyliner23]

I got both too ...but decided to flip it for a hulk after getting bored with the PCL for a while

[donniedragon]

My first Rolex was a sub and my 2nd is a GMT2 16710 black. Distinctive differences: a sub has matt sides on its links, where a GMT has polished sides. Which makes it looks shinier on the wrist. And also the GMT case is thinner comparing to a sub (the sea dweller is thicker than a sub), and lastly, its bracelet clasp is thinner as well. It meakes the GMT looks unique and noticeable from far. However, not sure about the new 116710, because dont really like its two-tone bracelet.

[donniedragon]

Bro i just traded my GMT 16710 D series to a private dealer. I can recommend you if you are still keen.

[Shintz]

GMT master but not the current model prefer the 16710 or even a vintage 1675

[leesg123]

I would prefer the GMT2C half gold!

[myeemeng@hotmail.com]

submariner - the hulk

[jimmysm]

Juz bought a GMT II as my 1st Rolex, the bezel look nicer than the sub