Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

**Matty** · 11-12-12, 11:44 PM

IMHO, both have their merits & if $$$ allow, best to get both & wear/keep them in good faith!

**jackjack** · 12-12-12, 12:32 AM

Ceramic for me

**R-oyster** · 12-12-12, 09:16 AM

I prefer a ceramic bezel - it just adds to the beauty of the watch with a greyish when set against the light.

**Vtjota** · 12-12-12, 01:41 PM

ceramic for aesthetic value, aluminium for keepsake

**jonathann** · 13-12-12, 02:29 PM

Ceramic. Makes the watch looks more bling compared to Alu

**nojo** · 07-01-13, 07:06 PM

looks like the minority but a vote for old school alu

**P88** · 07-01-13, 10:52 PM

Ceramic for me too.

**bastardaw** · 06-02-13, 02:37 PM

This is making it hard to choose....

**Tigertime!!** · 12-02-13, 02:09 PM

Creremic is heavy

**terry79** · 14-06-13, 09:19 AM

i vote for Non-ceremic

**Skylecan** · 17-06-13, 09:42 PM

Ceramic has a bling outlook ( on the bezel n dial ) as compared to the old model.

**philip550** · 25-06-13, 06:48 PM

wow amazing alright love it guys

**Devainqueur** · 26-06-13, 12:34 AM

16610 lv will be my choice

**lthg25** · 03-07-13, 08:34 AM

Cannot decide so I have both!

**Gunbucker** · 03-07-13, 11:54 AM

Ceramic for LV subs (it's supposed to be bling!), and Aluminium for black subs for that tool watch utilitarian look.

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop