Tweet
No date for me
-
-
like TS, im still caught in the middle. date or no date. still very much undecidedComment
-
No date is nicer I feel...seems it makes the watch more complete with the 3' o'clock position compared to the date on the date models..Comment
-
IMHO with date is nicer. Maybe I am just used to watches with date.Comment
-
Any difference in terms of value holding between the 2?Comment
-
ND for me.. I like its symmetrical and balanced look..Comment
-
No sub date.Comment
-
see your burget, if ok better get date oneComment
-
yea.. i prefer the one with date too...Comment
-
If $$$ is not an issue, get both! Otherwise the sub date would be a better buy imho, cos of the extra date function & cyclops lens to magnify the date display?
Rolex owner since 2010
Previously owned:
Explorer II(216570) black dial AN serial
GMT-Master II(116710LN) AN serial
Current collection:
Datejust 36(116234) V serial
GMT-Master II(116713LN) AN serial
Upcoming/Wishlist:
"Hulk" green sub(116610LV)Comment
-
A sub without the cyclop doesnt feel like a sub, IMHO.Comment
-
-
i think go with the date
Comment
-
Bro TS so u got your sub???
If u only getting one get the one with date... If u planning to get more than one get e ND sub... Btw sub was born without a date window... Then they add the date window and call it a sub date...
CheersComment
-
Sub date. Anyday.Only a Rolex will do for me..a tradition passed down from my father and his father..
I have a love-hate relationship with rolex, i hate the prices but love the pieces..
Proud owner of a Rolex Explorer II 216570 polar since 27/2/13..okay..not anymore
Comment
Comment