Hi guys, look like i am the only one with the non-date sub. haha. find the date one too big for my wrist. maybe get it in 10 years time when i am 30. lol. anyway below is the gallery for my humble watch. =)
Hi guys, look like i am the only one with the non-date sub. haha. find the date one too big for my wrist. maybe get it in 10 years time when i am 30. lol. anyway below is the gallery for my humble watch. =)
[QUOTE=xylene87;395]Hi guys, look like i am the only one with the non-date sub. haha. find the date one too big for my wrist. maybe get it in 10 years time when i am 30. lol. anyway below is the gallery for my humble watch. =)
Very nice and after looking at it, I am beginning to want one too, since i always find it a hassle to set the date whenever I dun use my sub for a time. but as ohlins says, aren't the date and no date the same size, or is it just the illusion without the cyclops?
Also, is there such a thing as a boy size sub???
-----------------------------------------
Bought In '97
Rolex SS Submariner Date 16610 [T-series]
-----------------------------------------
Hi guys, look like i am the only one with the non-date sub. haha. find the date one too big for my wrist. maybe get it in 10 years time when i am 30. lol. anyway below is the gallery for my humble watch. =)
Very nice and after looking at it, I am beginning to want one too, since i always find it a hassle to set the date whenever I dun use my sub for a time. but as ohlins says, aren't the date and no date the same size, or is it just the illusion without the cyclops?
Also, is there such a thing as a boy size sub???
nono. no such thing as a boy size sub. however, i believe that there is definitely a difference in size leh. the other time i was at dickson watches and i tried both. maybe its the difference in weight that sets them apart? haha. or maybe its the non date that is screaming for me to buy him. coz i didnt wanna get it off after i tried it on. =X
nono. no such thing as a boy size sub. however, i believe that there is definitely a difference in size leh. the other time i was at dickson watches and i tried both. maybe its the difference in weight that sets them apart? haha. or maybe its the non date that is screaming for me to buy him. coz i didnt wanna get it off after i tried it on. =X
Yes, you are right, I checked:
Sports Submariner 16610 Y 40 13 40 30.5
Sports Submariner 14060 N 39.5 12.3 39.5 29.2
Case, thickness, bezel and crystal are all slightly smaller.
-----------------------------------------
Bought In '97
Rolex SS Submariner Date 16610 [T-series]
-----------------------------------------
Comment