Official Submariner and Seadweller thread!

[hydesg]

I already have a GMTcII, would you guys recommend a DSSD, SubC or the green hulk? So spoilt for choices in that price range!

[Resurge]

Thanks for the information. I will just have to decide on which one to get and make a wise choice

Whatever type of sub u decide to purchase,it will not be a bad choice.The sub is just simply a classic watch which can stand the test of time.

[sthark]

Sub with Date:-

16610
16610 LV Kermit
116610 LN. Ceramic Sub
116610 LV Hulk

Excluding Vintage Subs.

Thanks for the information. I will just have to decide on which one to get and make a wise choice

[zidaneong]

Hi I am new to this forum. I am thinking to get a new sub with date. Just wondering how many types/series of sub are there?

Thanks

Sub with Date:-

16610
16610 LV Kermit
116610 LN. Ceramic Sub
116610 LV Hulk

Excluding Vintage Subs.

[sthark]

Hi I am new to this forum. I am thinking to get a new sub with date. Just wondering how many types/series of sub are there?

Thanks

[jimmy631]

I have been look around for a blue dial half gold 16613 TT... Dealers dun have, private sale also dun have. Looks like this model is very well received by owners, especially the blue dial model.

I just dun like the ceramics new model, still prefer the steel bezel. Anyone selling these here?

[Resurge]

Just Got my Sub C yesterday, Truly a master piece

enjoy ur new purchase and welcome to the sub c family.

[Skylecan]

Just Got my Sub C yesterday, Truly a master piece

[Fabiantan14]

Hi guys, I'm new here.. just got a pre-own sub. It is a transition model 16803. There seems to be very little information about this model.. was wondering if anyone of you can help.

[skydweller_sg]

not everyone can carry the dssd well
but if you could, it outshines the gmt2c and sub c as a sports watch, hands-down

Preference between GMT2 and Submariner depends on whether you need second time zone or waterproofing. Nothing much else to separate the two.

As for DSSD, it's just too heavy and large for normal use.

[archangelfire]

Preference between GMT2 and Submariner depends on whether you need second time zone or waterproofing. Nothing much else to separate the two.

As for DSSD, it's just too heavy and large for normal use.

[DJNellaf]

I personally prefer the sub with no date. More youthful looking and subtle.

[dreamer23]

Maybe some prefer the retro feel w the magnifying glass above the date

[skydweller_sg]

the more i compare the dssd and gmt2c with the sub c, the more i feel that submariner is quickly losing its flagship status

truth is, the new sub c case lugs looks too squarish, with a weird proportion for the crown protectors size
it looks too much like the gmt2c without its own identity
the new squarish shape departs from the beautiful streamline design of the sub 16610 and seadweller 16660 quite substantially

on top of that, rolex made the gmt2c so similar to a submariner (bigger crown), that the former is actually now more popular than its big brother - of course, with the addition of bling factor (center polished links, large bezel index) and gmt hand, i guess rolex sells more gmt2c than sub c - just a guess

the dssd, on the other hand, is designed more closely to the 16610 and 16660 classic shape
the proportions of the lugs, crown protector, crown, case thickness are much better compared to the squarish sub c and gmt2c

i feel the magnifying glass above the date is also losing its appeal, looks rather old fashioned and outdated
dssd without the magnifying glass looks cleaner

now i know why the dssd and the daytona are priced the highest among all rolex sports models

[yngfai]

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...424232026.jpg/