Tweet
Sure is Rolex Submarine.
-
-
A new proud owner of a brand new GMT 2 here![SIZE=5][COLOR="#008000"][FONT=Century Gothic]Rolex[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]
[COLOR="#0000FF"]AN[/COLOR]-series 116613 [COLOR="#0000FF"]LB[/COLOR]
AN-series 116713 LN
[B]G[/B]-series 116710 LN
[B][COLOR="#2e8b57"]M[/COLOR][/B]-series 16610 [COLOR="#2e8b57"]LV[/COLOR]
[B][COLOR="#2e8b57"]G[/COLOR][/B]-series 116610 [COLOR="#2e8b57"]LV[/COLOR]Comment
-
Was in the same boat when I was looking to acquire my first Rolex. Not knowing any better, went with the Submariner purely on aesthetics alone as I felt the GMT II's bezel and dial looked very busy. Now that I know the history and heritage of both, glad I made that choice!
Still, will be gunning for a 1675 some day.Comment
-
My first Rolex is 16570,z series. N I just bought new GMT master 2 yesterday.dunno y, 116610ln n lv nv come across my mind.
May get 16610 in futureComment
-
tough choice here, but if i've to own/hav/choose only 1, then i'll go with GMT Master 2 cos it has both useful GMT function & sporty/dressy looks
Rolex owner since 2010
Previously owned:
Explorer II(216570) black dial AN serial
GMT-Master II(116710LN) AN serial
Current collection:
Datejust 36(116234) V serial
GMT-Master II(116713LN) AN serial
Upcoming/Wishlist:
"Hulk" green sub(116610LV)Comment
-
Close fight but the Sub wins by a whisker. GMT II's bezel looks too cluttered and distracting, personally prefer the cleaner look of the sub
Comment
-
IF SS i would choose LV HULK.
IF 18k full gold i go for GMT II C Black dial.Comment
-
brushed steel bracelet not so blingy and probably less prone to scuffs.Comment
-
It's got to be the Rolex Sub, and might as well get the green bezel 50th anniversary sub.
The sub is right up there besides the datejust as the quintessential Rolex.Comment
-
I think the GMT II is a very practical watch foor travellers, but in terms of looks, i prefer the sub bezel, which determines the overall look of the watch. Tho I like the GMT II green hand, and some might feel the sub is a bit 'boring & predictable', but that's the look that so many other watch makers out there have tried to copy/use. there's no better complement than having ppl copy you. the history of the sub made me incline towards it as well.
But overall, I would certainly prefer the sub, in addition to my love for the sea.Comment
-
The Sub!! =) *maybe just me, the sub is more poisonous.Comment
-
Hi can I know the current price between the GMT and subComment
-
Sub for meComment
-
for SS steel version, usually about $500 sing apart. Price wise, always depend on your relationship with ADsComment
-
the SS or TT ceramic submariner works for me!Comment
Comment