Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gmt ii series

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Yes I will not go for Z plus 6 numbers. It never really bother me until recently. That is probably why Rolex use the alphanumeric system now so that they will have lesser issues in the future with guys like me Because no one can trace what is the production date except for Rolex.

    Originally posted by nim
    My guess is rolex geneva produced these Z+6numbers in 2007 and only recently QCed and COSC-certified in 2011 hence the computer system showed production date as late-2011
    the L+7numbers could be the new 8digits random system that existed between the V and G, not too sure about this

    Personally I wouldnt get a Z+6numbers now even if computer shows 2011 production, because of the ambiguity
    the L+7number is fine though, as the 8digit system started in 2010
    Patek Philippe Nautilus (5712G, 5712R, 5726A)
    Rolex Yatch-Master II (116688)
    Rolex GMT-Master II (116718LN)
    Rolex Submariner Date (116619LB)
    Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (116505, 116515LN)

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by nim
      hi jack is it U+7number or U+7alpha numeric
      mine goes something like U22N2222

      replace the '2' with arabic numbers =) alpha numeric series bah... i was offer a G series but my AD told me the alpha series is newer and I took his words

      Comment


      • #33
        Dear all seniors...I got my GMT in this month and it starts with JAXXXXXX (06 Digits)...is this consider alphanumeric and is it one of the latest? Pls advise. Thank you.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by nim
          Total 8 digit its alpha
          Thank you Nim for sharing.

          Comment

          Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

          Collapse

          Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

          Collapse
          Working...
          X