I got some enquiries from a bro here regarding the sea-dweller...
I hope the following anwsers your doubts and sarcasms... now we all can see the words Sea-Dweller clearly on this watch, can't we? Note the "Depth: 1200m"
I want also to add that if the watch was indeed not an SD but a Submariner (No-Date), the water pressure would have blown the crystal off liao... cos Sub can only dive up to 300m
More pictures to enjoy...
For complete story of the Sea-Dweller was tested by an individual (Mr. Pol Palacios) to 1200m (note that the website is in French), please visit this URL:
http://bruno.cracco.free.fr/montres/...s/plongee.html
Hope these pictures helps...
Still not convinced the SD is a tough watch?
Wait for the SD Deep Sea (Ref 116600) to arrive... this new Bad Boy can dive 3 times deeper than the Sea-Dweller 4000 (Ref. 16600) !!!
Cheers
Originally posted by deadbench
I hope the following anwsers your doubts and sarcasms... now we all can see the words Sea-Dweller clearly on this watch, can't we? Note the "Depth: 1200m"
I want also to add that if the watch was indeed not an SD but a Submariner (No-Date), the water pressure would have blown the crystal off liao... cos Sub can only dive up to 300m
More pictures to enjoy...
For complete story of the Sea-Dweller was tested by an individual (Mr. Pol Palacios) to 1200m (note that the website is in French), please visit this URL:
http://bruno.cracco.free.fr/montres/...s/plongee.html
Hope these pictures helps...
Still not convinced the SD is a tough watch?
Wait for the SD Deep Sea (Ref 116600) to arrive... this new Bad Boy can dive 3 times deeper than the Sea-Dweller 4000 (Ref. 16600) !!!
Cheers
Comment