I believe that it could be becos the tritium dots were hand applied
A perfectly placed dot would sit clearly showing 3 lines on the left and 3 lines on the right leaving a faint fourth line on both sides of the dot . It wasnt something which was of utmost importance as the difference is just probably 0.001mm...
This effect could be "worsened" due to a relume and thisdial does look relumed.
I am certainly not a vintage Rolex expert as all but i have owned and seen quite a few older tritium dials on daydates and datejusts.
i realise that the tritium dot is almost never 100% precise and perfect.
For this dial, it simply shows up more prominently due to the small tiny sweep second markers
I guess that makes up part of the intrigue in owning a Vintage rolex!
For anyone who owns a 70s datejust or daydate reading this, go and scrutinise the tritium dot on your watch, the likelihood is that a few dots would be "out of place" by a very very small margin.
Talking about this tritium dot, I've got 2 1803 having the same defect. (Both verified original by RSC)
Actually cleaning cloths like this may not necessarily be fake, could be very old ones.
In fact, i would not say even say that this cloth is fake until i see the whole piece.
I had an old cleaning cloth with green Rolexprint and green border piping made of a somewhat similar material
I have the same cloth too but texture and print quality is different. But then again, it could be due to washing of the cloth and I don't think it make much commercial sense to produce fake Rolex cloth. You could be right.
I have the same cloth too but texture and print quality is different. But then again, it could be due to washing of the cloth and I don't think it make much commercial sense to produce fake Rolex cloth. You could be right.
Wow, that's serious business getting the cloth involved in the discussion.
how to tell man. The person copying to make a fake dial will try it look almost 100% alike to an original one.
Like fake Mercury and real Mercury iphone cases.
Can't differentiate on photo.
looks original. dial is original but could be refinished. even if refinished, it is a very very good job.
scoc slightly lower than normal. T swiss T generally shd be more aligned with the sub min markers but I have seen other variations too.
Daytona 116519 Meteorite, 16528 MK3 dia Reb Sub 1680 MK2 x 2, mk4, MK6 BP ,116613LB Dia, 16610LV MK1 GMT 1675Pepsi MK1, GILT BP,GMT 16753 Nipple Mocha x2 bp
GMT II 16760 Coke FAT Lady, 16758 nipple DD 6611B x 2, 1803 RG, wide boy
DD 18038 Dia, 18039, 18308 dia, 18238 malachite
DJ 6520, 6605, 6581, 1601/1603 x 6, 16220/30/34 cream
AP 15300 Black
Tudor 7016 small rose gilt dial GP 18k RG
IWC Port 3714 Chrono
Chronoswiss Skeleton
Corum Bubble Lucifer
Comment