To be honest, I do hope to have see thru case back for my Rolex just like my AP RO 15300 and IWC Port 5001. But if it's not original, better play safe. If everything happened, warranty could be void and the watch could be damaged. I have seen such modifications before. It's between aesthetic vs reliability.
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sapphire Display Case back for Rolex
Collapse
X
-
I don't really fancy modifying Rolex after what I saw at RSC when servicing my 6694 years ago.
The woman has this diamond dazzled bazel on her datejust and the RSC girl simply told her that in order to service her still-under-warranty watch, they will remove all the non-orginal parts (diamond studded bazel fixed by someone in Lucky Plaza she presumed to be AD) and all warranty is now void, and they will not guarante any water-resistant or whatever.
BTW, removing the SS back case and replace with a see thru case, when send for service, put back the old case, can the RSC people know? It is not exactly modifying, just like changing the presidential bracelet with oyster-link bracelet right?
Comment
-
No way will I do such modification to a rolex. An oyster is supposed to have an oyster case.
I am a great fan of see-thru back but there are so many good and nice watches out there with see-thru back. Those with manual movement is more interesting/beautiful
If you must see the rolex movement, there are some places where you can get the movements only...heheWatches are like potato chips - You never stop at one
Never political, seldom diplomatic, always honest
Comment
-
Originally posted by commoner View PostI don't really fancy modifying Rolex after what I saw at RSC when servicing my 6694 years ago.
The woman has this diamond dazzled bazel on her datejust and the RSC girl simply told her that in order to service her still-under-warranty watch, they will remove all the non-orginal parts (diamond studded bazel fixed by someone in Lucky Plaza she presumed to be AD) and all warranty is now void, and they will not guarante any water-resistant or whatever.
BTW, removing the SS back case and replace with a see thru case, when send for service, put back the old case, can the RSC people know? It is not exactly modifying, just like changing the presidential bracelet with oyster-link bracelet right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by siambee View Postwrong, rolex prince original come along with see thru case....
Current Collection :
1) Rolex YG White Mother of Pearl Roman Dial Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial)
2) Rolex YG Black Computer Roman Dial Datejust 16238 (L Serial)
3) Rolex TT Blue Submariner 16613LB (M Serial)
4) Rolex YG Red Vignette DayDate 18038 (8 mil Serial)
5) Rolex PT Pinkish White MOP DayDate 18206 (A Serial)
Comment
-
Originally posted by feilong108 View Postmy fave rolex...thanks to bro siambee for posting and brighten up my day!!!!
Originally posted by zidaneong View PostOic, dont know abt this as ceillini, prince are not my field. cos I interested in sports and those like DJ & DD. Learn something new again.
cheers.98456357
Comment
-
Originally posted by cck1609 View PostHi everyone,
Where can i find display back for my Sub? which shops are selling and how much? tks
http://jwwatch.com/showpro_details.asp?id=1&cat=640
Comment
-
can you advise why the end links of the bracelet has no model number?
Originally posted by customwatchconcepts View Postif you have issues with your account, click here for self help and read forum rules here. 90% of your answers can be found in Forum FAQ
i DO NOT respond to any pm regarding account issues
kindly email with- subject heading indicating your issue
- your nick
- your corresponding email address
- state what you were trying to do and what the system prevented you to do
if you receive no response in pm or email, it means your answers can be found in the Forum FAQ here
your kind understanding is very much appreciated.
disclaimer : all opinions expressed are personal
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment