Ok guys . Need a little help here . Say i was offered the same watch .. Condition wise but .. One is with papers and the other without .. its a 2004/2005 model and both no more warranty. So whats a reasonable difference, more like what's the norm ? 200 to 300 ? thanks for any help rendered
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How much does the lack of papers affect selling price ?
Collapse
X
-
ask yourself this question: will u be flipping it in the future? from my personal experience, at least 300 & above.Remnants of my irresponsibility:
"Foreign affections"
1) Sinn U1-30 June 2007
2) Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 M series-23 Jan 08 (HER perpetual oyster )
3) Omega Seamaster Chrono Diver 2225.80.00-25 Jul 08 (From Wife )
4) IWC Top Gun Chrono-20 Sep 09
What's NEXT?
Comment
-
Originally posted by absolutgary View Postmight flip .. find it abit too bling in an uncle kinda way ^^ thanks .. thts wht i though also ... 300 sounds reasonable
Anyway which piece u want to get? TT DJ?
Originally posted by 116520 View PostNo difference to me...
if you plan to wear the watch, no difference to me since no more warranty...
if you plan to display the watch in a museum, paper & box will be nice...
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
If you plan to sell in the future
Originally posted by absolutgary View PostOk guys . Need a little help here . Say i was offered the same watch .. Condition wise but .. One is with papers and the other without .. its a 2004/2005 model and both no more warranty. So whats a reasonable difference, more like what's the norm ? 200 to 300 ? thanks for any help rendered
I would say around SGD 500 apart. Personally I would not buy any modern rolex without papers. But that's just me.
Even if you do not think you will sell in the future, still better to have that piece of paper just in case.Last edited by Reborn; 09-10-08, 10:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reborn View PostQuite important ! And warranty validity is not the issue here, because many who want the papers see it as helping to complete the package. So whether papers are valid or not is not the key issue here. This is generally the sentiments of collectors all over the world. You can ask the same question on timezone to get a broader response.
I would say around SGD 500 apart. Personally I would not buy any modern rolex without papers. But that's just me.
Even if you do not think you will sell in the future, still better to have that piece of paper just in case.
First I want him to answer my $1,000,000 question...what watch you intend to get?
Originally posted by Oceanklassik View Post
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
Ok this is personal preference,there are some collectors who die die want full set that means warrenty is a must. But that's just an "extra" because it's not valid already.
Realistically speaking...it's of no use even if it's inside IN THIS CASE. So it's up to you.
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
Fair enough, I think you have addressed the key question
Originally posted by Darkangel View PostOk..let's hold it. And not make him blur...
First I want him to answer my $1,000,000 question...what watch you intend to get?
Nah...only reason for the price diff is that..it's a M series..and M series means within warrenty period. That explains the lower price
I was speaking broadly.
Comment
-
my take is this:
if you intend to keep, shouldnt matter if you dont mind.
if you intend to sell in future, papers is nice, it gives an element of "completeness"
for me, at the end of the day, i still want everything to be complete, and as such, i will always prefer papers over those without papers.[U]Currently wearing[/U]:
[SIZE="1"]TT Datejust with diamond dial - sold!
Blue 6694
Seiko SD-lookalike[/SIZE]
[U]"My collection"[/U]:
[SIZE="1"]Blue 6694; TT DJ w diamond dial.[/SIZE]
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment