Let me clarify the situation
I am the one who provided info on the possible deal after seeing interest on a Daytona on this site. The seller offered me the watch via email but I was not interested.
So when I drew attention to the deal, and said that there is this deal at SGD 15600, I reminded buyers that I am not responsible for the authenticity because I have not seen the watch. From the money point of view, I also have nothing to do with this watch - it's not mine. Therefore there is no reason for me to provide a guarantee on the watch. Lastly, I have never bought from the guy even though I met him about twice or thrice in the past, as fellow watch collectors who got to know each other via the internet. So my repeated advice to potential buyers is - better check at RSC to be sure.
However, we cannot now accuse him of trying to cheat or anything because there is no proof of this. I think he was prepared to deal at an AD in Singapore, and was offering it at SGD 15600. (At least this was what he said. ) The deal fell through with some because of price, and others over the RSC inspection. Personally, I would also not buy anything not inspected at RSC if I do not know the seller well. So I think buyers were right to walk away from the deal.
Having said this, I feel that the only conclusion we can make is this - no RSC inspection, no deal. Or that this is not a friendly or flexible dealer. But to extrapolate beyond this is being presumptuous because we have no proof.
Originally posted by tomcatf
View Post
So when I drew attention to the deal, and said that there is this deal at SGD 15600, I reminded buyers that I am not responsible for the authenticity because I have not seen the watch. From the money point of view, I also have nothing to do with this watch - it's not mine. Therefore there is no reason for me to provide a guarantee on the watch. Lastly, I have never bought from the guy even though I met him about twice or thrice in the past, as fellow watch collectors who got to know each other via the internet. So my repeated advice to potential buyers is - better check at RSC to be sure.
However, we cannot now accuse him of trying to cheat or anything because there is no proof of this. I think he was prepared to deal at an AD in Singapore, and was offering it at SGD 15600. (At least this was what he said. ) The deal fell through with some because of price, and others over the RSC inspection. Personally, I would also not buy anything not inspected at RSC if I do not know the seller well. So I think buyers were right to walk away from the deal.
Having said this, I feel that the only conclusion we can make is this - no RSC inspection, no deal. Or that this is not a friendly or flexible dealer. But to extrapolate beyond this is being presumptuous because we have no proof.
Comment