Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

14060M v Exp II

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 14060M v Exp II

    hi guys
    Sub ND vs Exp II

    which one do you prefer ???
    seem both models are not so demanding now
    (correct me if i am wrong)

    so the ADs might offer them better discount
    so might be more justified to buy now
    other models seem no discount or at a premium

    then wait wishfully and hopefully that Rolex will announce
    ... discontinue ... major changes ...

  • #2
    Except Daytona, I can't bear with any watches that come without date. Hence, My preference is Exp II, a working watch that serve my everyday needs.

    SS Daytona Black Dial,
    SS GMT II coke, SS GMT IIC, TT GMT IIC,
    SS Sub Date, TT Sub Date Black,
    SS SD,
    SS YM,
    SS YM Mid Size,

    Comment


    • #3
      Yup, same for me. Prefer date, n esp so with cyclops since its ROLEX!

      The Crown Of Achievement

      Comment


      • #4
        Personally, I prefer the Exp-II too. IMHO, it's a really versatile watch that looks great for both work and play.
        运筹帷幄 决胜千里

        Comment


        • #5
          i like the clean dial and not into GMT type with extra hand...so i vote for the sub...hehe..IMO it look very classic and nice....timeless classic...
          Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak

          Courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen

          Quoted from Sir Winston Churchill

          Comment


          • #6
            hi..can i ask,, 14060 and 14060m
            which one more worth to keep?
            wha's the diff?
            1st) RXW 2-counter PLAsmiR mILgRapH
            2nd) PAM000J
            3rd) Sea-Dweller

            WishliSt :
            1)AP diver
            2)Sinn U1

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by psee View Post
              Personally, I prefer the Exp-II too. IMHO, it's a really versatile watch that looks great for both work and play.
              totally agree. polar exp II looks really good with office attire but out of place when casual. black exp goes with basically everything.

              sub ND has always been a fave but i date & gmt function makes the exp II a much better buy IMHO.
              Remnants of my irresponsibility:
              "Foreign affections"
              1) Sinn U1-30 June 2007
              2) Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 M series-23 Jan 08 (HER perpetual oyster )
              3) Omega Seamaster Chrono Diver 2225.80.00-25 Jul 08 (From Wife )
              4) IWC Top Gun Chrono-20 Sep 09
              What's NEXT?

              Comment


              • #8
                Will have to agree that the Exp II is more functional and practical to own.
                Time is too precious to be measured by a cheap watch...

                Patek 5065, Rolex 16600, 16700, 16710, IWC 3786, JLC Reverso Chrono, PAM 190G, PAM 219I, AP RO Chrono

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by skyline View Post
                  hi..can i ask,, 14060 and 14060m
                  which one more worth to keep?
                  wha's the diff?
                  The 14060M has an improved and newer movement compared to the 14060


                  Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    how about the bracelet of the 14060M, i remembered reading somewhere that its bracelet is different from that of the Sub with Date. true?




                    Originally posted by Darkangel View Post
                    The 14060M has an improved and newer movement compared to the 14060

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by driver View Post
                      how about the bracelet of the 14060M, i remembered reading somewhere that its bracelet is different from that of the Sub with Date. true?
                      Yes the bracelet is different.


                      Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        hmmm
                        more favour exp II

                        so the sub ND is less popuplar cos of missing date function

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          wat price did AD give u for de 2 models?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Explorer II for me! Preferably the newest M series with the Rolex
                            RolexRolex engraving and supposedly newer movement.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Both cost about the same when new... but pre-owned value for Exp II hold much better... So, why waste money?

                              Again is up to individual, Buy what you like and sell what you don't later, Bros here will be greatful of your kindness...
                              Last edited by tomcatf; 29-07-08, 12:45 AM.

                              SS Daytona Black Dial,
                              SS GMT II coke, SS GMT IIC, TT GMT IIC,
                              SS Sub Date, TT Sub Date Black,
                              SS SD,
                              SS YM,
                              SS YM Mid Size,

                              Comment

                              Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

                              Collapse

                              Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X