Of course, newer model ones are without pin holes but take Sub for an example, when choosing two Sub with the same year production, one with pin holes and the other without, which one is better? Any difference in price value? Let the experts start the talking....
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pin holes BETTER or No Pin holes BETTER?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 116520 View PostOf course, newer model ones are without pin holes but take Sub for an example, when choosing two Sub with the same year production, one with pin holes and the other without, which one is better? Any difference in price value? Let the experts start the talking....
As for which is better, you will have to define better better. If one doesn't mind pinhole for making the watch looks a bit older, then pinhole is a good choice too because they're cheaper and they allow the bracelet to be removed easierDream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today. -James Dean
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oceanklassik View PostAiyo friend, tis topic oso got discussed b4 lah.. let me find for u.
excuse me as I am a newbie here....
BTW, really hard to think of some topics to discuss that are not discussed b4 here....
Comment
-
No worries, just to share and talk cock oni..
Here it is tho nt very close to topic: http://sg-roc.com/showthread.php?t=442&highlight=holes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oceanklassik View PostNo worries, just to share and talk cock oni..
Here it is tho nt very close to topic: http://sg-roc.com/showthread.php?t=442&highlight=holes
Hahahaha...
But I think it's personal preference. If you are the type that likes to take out bracelet and stuff often then take the 1 with pinhole, coz with pinhole easier to remove.
But if you just buy to like wear only...get the 1 w/o pinhole...looks abit better I think...more solid
Sometimes forgotten, but always contactable. Darkangel (2007-2014)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darkangel View PostBut I think it's personal preference. If you are the type that likes to take out bracelet and stuff often then take the 1 with pinhole, coz with pinhole easier to remove.
Comment
-
It's a short-run question, since the non pinhole versious are newer.
In the long run it probably would not make any real diff. In fact, if you look at models which had long production runs e.g. GMT 1675 ... those which were earlier with 'matt' dials now command 20-30% more than the later ones with gloss dials. Similar for 5513 (I think)...
but when they were fairly new, people probably wanted the 'newer' dials too.
I am ok with either. For me a bigger concern is tritium vs luminova... since the former does not work anymore . But some people will tell you they prefer the look of creamy aged tritium.
Comment
-
The end pieces of a bracelet meant for a watch with pin holes are flushed at the underside of the the lugs when fitted.
So I would think that u can't attach a bracelet meant for a watch with pin holes to a watch that has no pin holes. Or at least u can but I can't figure out how u're going to subsequently detach the bracelet without damaging it.
However, u won't have such a problem when u attach a bracelet meant for a watch with no pin holes onto a watch with pin holes.
Guess we can still appreciate holes .Our eyes must be ugliest part of our face; everyone looks good when wearing sunglasses
Comment
-
pinholes for me. removing bracelet from SD is a *****!Remnants of my irresponsibility:
"Foreign affections"
1) Sinn U1-30 June 2007
2) Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 M series-23 Jan 08 (HER perpetual oyster )
3) Omega Seamaster Chrono Diver 2225.80.00-25 Jul 08 (From Wife )
4) IWC Top Gun Chrono-20 Sep 09
What's NEXT?
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment