Originally posted by Choo Yao Chuen
View Post
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Aquanaut and Nautilus
Collapse
X
-
You Never Actually Own A Patek Philippe. You Merely Take Care Of It For The Next Generation.
MY HUMBLE COLLECTION:
2014 Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167/1A-001
2012 Rolex GMT II 116713LN Steel With Gold "G" SERIAL
2011 ROLEX SUBMARINER 116610LN Ceramic Bezel "V" SERIAL
HER'S:
Rolex Oyster Perpetual (Stainless Steel) Black Dial with Diamond Markers
Rolex ladies datejust 69173 (Half-Gold) Blue Dial with Diamond Markers
-
Originally posted by toffeesthings View PostHehe, my choice is clear (as seen in my sig)...
The PP Aquanaut:
Advantages:
1. Aestheically more appealing (arabic numerals vs baton numerals)
2. Cheaper price point (same movement as Nautilus but about 10k cheaper)
3. Youthful appeal (less stoic compared to the regal Nautilus)
4. Versatile (doubles up better as a sports and dress watch, bracelet and strap options)
One might argue that the Nautilus is more iconic but with the right marketing and time, the Aquanaut should gain momentum...
...now, if only it was 2mm bigger...You Never Actually Own A Patek Philippe. You Merely Take Care Of It For The Next Generation.
MY HUMBLE COLLECTION:
2014 Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167/1A-001
2012 Rolex GMT II 116713LN Steel With Gold "G" SERIAL
2011 ROLEX SUBMARINER 116610LN Ceramic Bezel "V" SERIAL
HER'S:
Rolex Oyster Perpetual (Stainless Steel) Black Dial with Diamond Markers
Rolex ladies datejust 69173 (Half-Gold) Blue Dial with Diamond Markers
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment