Originally posted by ladymatic
View Post
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pam 111 and 112 are nice but someome said they are just base model
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by pegasi View PostThe main issue with 312 is its thickness not the case size. 392 houses the same movement but in a case 2mm smaller than the 312. Hence I imagine the thickness of 392 is even more obvious both look and feel wise so do take note.
On the other hand, some say 372 though 47mm doesn't wear very big and wear better than 312 due to it's thinner, so don't like base on case size.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Milgauss74 View PostWatches are subjective to individual's preference, follow your heart, u wun go wrong. Follow other's rude comments, u tends to regret later. Having said that, I do have PAM 111 as my base model and first PAM. To this date, I still luv the sandwich dial, see thru case and everything in it. Not to mention, I have been changing straps to different colours to match my outfit. :P
Comment
-
-
Hi new owner of a pre own Pam 112 here. Had been looking for a Pam for daily and finally set on 112. No regrets as dial is clean with sandwich (my fav must have) and the see thru case back. It's fun having this watch, straps and straps! Now my GMT2 might need to rest more lol. I think both 111 and 112 are good starter. Not forgetting other popular base models like 000, 005.... List goes
Btw where is a good place for strap shopping? Other than online, any shops to recommend?
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment