both r nice, but i have never seen a 232 in real. it looks very clean. strangly pam looks better with less wordings or if the dial is not so busy. am i correct? haha maybe i should by a 232? the price seems not bad now
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A "no right" argument/comparsion - 232 vs 190....
Collapse
X
-
I got the 190 first (2nd 'serious' watch ever), then the 210, and then the 232.
First to go was the 210, and then the 232 and 29 watches later, the 190 still remains.
Go for the 232 if you want something truly reflective of the Panerai DNA.
For me, the buttery smooth winding, and the more comfortable 45mm wear (for me) made me choose the 190.
Ender"Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence,
three times is enemy action and
over 600 is clearly the work of an ancient Sumerian demon or some sh*t."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ender View PostI got the 190 first (2nd 'serious' watch ever), then the 210, and then the 232.
First to go was the 210, and then the 232 and 29 watches later, the 190 still remains.
Go for the 232 if you want something truly reflective of the Panerai DNA.
For me, the buttery smooth winding, and the more comfortable 45mm wear (for me) made me choose the 190.
Ender
Comment
-
Cedric bro,
Thank you very much.
Execellent photographic skills, patience and passion.
Intoxicating pics....My humble beginning:
Ball - Conductor (SE), Rolex - Green Sub LV (Alpha-numeric series), Omega - PO XL & Pam - 351 (M-series)
Dream watch:
It is a tough choice between IWC IW500114 and IW500109.
[url]http://www.iwcportugieser.com/en/[/url]
[url]http://www.iwc.com/en-us/collection/portuguese/IW5001/[/url]
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment