then you should seriously consider the Pam,men
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
312 as a Starter?
Collapse
X
-
Hi Eng
312 or 320
Pros
1) In house movement .
2) 1950 casing
3) Clean , not so croweded
4) Easy to change strap with the two pin compare to the old one.
Cons
1) In house movement - if got problem, only Richemont would only able to fix it.
Zameen Bro,
Any more comments to add
Comment
-
ive rather fine wrist and am a lil worried that a 44 might not fit too well.
went to passions and tried a 233 (which is 45 right?) and it sat nicely on my wrist~! (woah the 233 is too sweet).
was considering the 104 but now.. i think 312... argh *clenches teeth*
not sure if i shd pull the trigger soon =|
Comment
-
Originally posted by korolev View Postive rather fine wrist and am a lil worried that a 44 might not fit too well.
went to passions and tried a 233 (which is 45 right?) and it sat nicely on my wrist~! (woah the 233 is too sweet).
was considering the 104 but now.. i think 312... argh *clenches teeth*
not sure if i shd pull the trigger soon =|
233 is still 44mm, but it look slightly bigger because the casing is a 1950.
Comment
-
The 312 is also a 1950 casing but without a dome crystal. And it actually wears bigger than a 233 as the 312 has a thicker case profile. I have both and can safely say the 312 wears bigger compared to the usual 44mm PAMsWhat's in the box:- Patek Philippe 5726A
- IWC Portu Chrono 3714-14
- Panerai 187 Subzilla
- Garmin Fenix 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by burnz View PostThe 312 is also a 1950 casing but without a dome crystal. And it actually wears bigger than a 233 as the 312 has a thicker case profile. I have both and can safely say the 312 wears bigger compared to the usual 44mm PAMsIn my possession
Breitling Headwind, Tag Heuer Aqua Racer, Glycine Incursore, Rolex DSSD , Pam320L, Pam305N and Chopard GTXL Power Reserve
Comment
-
Originally posted by burnz View PostThe 312 is also a 1950 casing but without a dome crystal. And it actually wears bigger than a 233 as the 312 has a thicker case profile. I have both and can safely say the 312 wears bigger compared to the usual 44mm PAMs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Seventh Son View PostYup! The 312 actually wear higher and looks bigger than the 233 although both are 44mm. The 312 has a thicker case and bigger bezel making it look bigger.
Comment
-
Originally posted by korolev View Posti was at rws and the salesman kept telling me that the 233 uses an identical casing as 312.
I have been kana Pam 312 poison and have decided on just buy 1 to stop the poison from spreading.
Seniors, if you got good local lobang to share, kindly freely PM me.
Thank you very much.
I'm very new in watch collection, just 3 months. To date, I have green sub LV & Omega PO already.
Thanks.My humble beginning:
Ball - Conductor (SE), Rolex - Green Sub LV (Alpha-numeric series), Omega - PO XL & Pam - 351 (M-series)
Dream watch:
It is a tough choice between IWC IW500114 and IW500109.
[url]http://www.iwcportugieser.com/en/[/url]
[url]http://www.iwc.com/en-us/collection/portuguese/IW5001/[/url]
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment