Originally posted by triton
View Post
Panerai if they adopt the Rolex way, putting couple of main models and repetitive exp: Pam 000,111,210 and 233 (EXAMPLE ONLY) as a main models like Rolex putting Submariner, Submariner Date, Gmt and Explorer, perhaps...just perhaps their brand wouldn't be as diluted as it is now. But that's just theoretically speaking.
All they could have done is to keep the models to a minimum. Since 1998 till maybe 2010, the amount of Special Edition have been very very very limited. Maybe around 2 to 3 MAX a year. And that makes the acquiring of SE models the highlight of the brand and for those who doesn't get one, the normal models are as good as they can get. Which is a perfectly fine business model.
But once they decided to released 7 to 11 SEs a year, it seems like acquiring the SE doesn't seems to be unrealistic anymore as buyers are spoilt for choices and since one can buy any SEs, what's the lure for getting the normal models then?
Thus their own killer, I feel, was their very own success...the Special Editions. With too many coming out, there's so much one can recycle the design and look and similarity it seems is the Panerai way.
Surviving? Not really...they are actually thriving...they have never gotten as popular as they are right now. Which is great. They need not care about how much their watches fetch and selling in the secondary market. They don't make anything from the secondary market thus what they do is to produce similar and at times remakes of past converted models which directly affect the preowned models. Why buy used preowned when you can get similar one brand new? They want you to spend money on new retail models than used secondary models.
Surely for Panerai, it's not the fittest survive...it's the "laboratory of ideas" if you get what I mean.
Comment