Originally posted by chershen
View Post
Nav Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Nav Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cheated By Seller!
Collapse
X
-
ox⋅y⋅mo⋅ron /ˌɒksɪˈmɔrɒn, -ˈmoʊr-/ [ok-si-mawr-on, -mohr-]
–noun, plural -mo⋅ra /-ˈmɔrə, -ˈmoʊrə/ [-mawr-uh, -mohr-uh]
Rhetoric. a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect, as in “cruel kindness” or “to make haste slowly.”Current pieces:
Tag Heuer Pilot Chronograph
Tag Heuer 2000
Evant Tropic Diver Bronze Green
Le Jour Mk I - 001
IWC Portuguese 7-Days
PAM 104
PAM 233
PAM 716
Rolex 16570 (Polar)
Rolex 16234
Rolex 116900 (Air-King)
Rolex 114060
Several Seiko New & Vintage
Wish-list 2018:
More Seikos
Rolex 126710BLRO (GMT2)
Comment
-
Originally posted by chershen View Postox⋅y⋅mo⋅ron /ˌɒksɪˈmɔrɒn, -ˈmoʊr-/ [ok-si-mawr-on, -mohr-]
–noun, plural -mo⋅ra /-ˈmɔrə, -ˈmoʊrə/ [-mawr-uh, -mohr-uh]
Rhetoric. a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect, as in “cruel kindness” or “to make haste slowly.”
Comment
-
English A*
Originally posted by chershen View Postox⋅y⋅mo⋅ron /ˌɒksɪˈmɔrɒn, -ˈmoʊr-/ [ok-si-mawr-on, -mohr-]
–noun, plural -mo⋅ra /-ˈmɔrə, -ˈmoʊrə/ [-mawr-uh, -mohr-uh]
Rhetoric. a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect, as in “cruel kindness” or “to make haste slowly.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by StanleyWee View PostWrong! After I discovered it I did not give any feedback to the seller and neither him. As a practise I don't give feedback to bad dealers.
I have deal with you before. I think you have forgotten about me already la as I did not give you ratings.
Whether good or bad, it is bad to public condemn a person. Better sms or PM to sold the person.
give a rating. If it's bad, don't give a rating. We may well end up in a situation where a person has a collecton of good ratings, will nil bad ratings, when in effect he has a mix bag. So we end up having a system with no bells and whistles to warn us of black sheep.
Why is this the case? Well it could be the person who experienced a bad is wary of making a bad rating because there will be endless exchanges. And when the exchanges get pretty hot, one or both may find himself banned from
the forum. So one suggestion to moderators is not to use the iron fist too often.
Comment
-
beware
Originally posted by StanleyWee View PostIs not my style to do that bro! People also earning a living la! Give ppl a road to walk la! He might have his reason of doing that. Who in the world don't do wrong. Most importantly is we must know how to forgive and forget la. furthermore I can only blame myself for not buying from AD.
Comment
-
Because we are living in a place where we are taught not to voice out anything...
Originally posted by R-oyster View PostI think this defeats the whole purpose of having a rating system. If it's good
give a rating. If it's bad, don't give a rating. We may well end up in a situation where a person has a collecton of good ratings, will nil bad ratings, when in effect he has a mix bag. So we end up having a system with no bells and whistles to warn us of black sheep.
Why is this the case? Well it could be the person who experienced a bad is wary of making a bad rating because there will be endless exchanges. And when the exchanges get pretty hot, one or both may find himself banned from
the forum. So one suggestion to moderators is not to use the iron fist too often.
Comment
-
Sorry my english score E lah.
My main concern is I just want to point out that bracelet links also got fake ones and buyers must be careful.
I think our the moderators did is very correct. If they don't do it with iron fist then the forum have no law and order. Anyone can just accuse anyone of something wrong.
That's why in the forum it is better not to condemn anyone. And furthermore, we can't blame the sellers as we did not check the watches properly first before payment. Some buyer even give positive ratings to seller then later bite back that the watch got problem. i feel that it is not fair to the sellers.
Of course myself is one of them. but luckily I did not give positve ratings to the seller before discovering the defects.[COLOR="Red"][B]WTB: BNIB DSSD. C.S Omega Snoopy. BNIB Daytona. [/B] [/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"][B]Rolex Green Submariner LV M-Series
Rolex GMT II Ceramic M-Series
Panerai Pam115G
Rolex TT Submariner 16613 M-Series
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 Z-Series
Rolex Black Explorer II M-Series
Rolex Sea-Dweller M-Series[/B] [/COLOR]
Comment
-
Originally posted by StanleyWee View PostSorry my english score E lah.
My main concern is I just want to point out that bracelet links also got fake ones and buyers must be careful.
I think our the moderators did is very correct. If they don't do it with iron fist then the forum have no law and order. Anyone can just accuse anyone of something wrong.
That's why in the forum it is better not to condemn anyone. And furthermore, we can't blame the sellers as we did not check the watches properly first before payment. Some buyer even give positive ratings to seller then later bite back that the watch got problem. i feel that it is not fair to the sellers.
Of course myself is one of them. but luckily I did not give positve ratings to the seller before discovering the defects.
Comment
-
I think that most dealers are ethical as long they don't sell fake watches. Most important watch head must be genuine. Some defects is ok lah.
i agreed more healthy thread to share on defects on watches that sellers sell is ok. But to condemn on sellers or to bring down the shop name board is not ethical lah. That is the time Moderators must take actions and close the thread. i support it! If not then ppl will any how condemn sellers and dealers falsely.[COLOR="Red"][B]WTB: BNIB DSSD. C.S Omega Snoopy. BNIB Daytona. [/B] [/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"][B]Rolex Green Submariner LV M-Series
Rolex GMT II Ceramic M-Series
Panerai Pam115G
Rolex TT Submariner 16613 M-Series
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 Z-Series
Rolex Black Explorer II M-Series
Rolex Sea-Dweller M-Series[/B] [/COLOR]
Comment
-
Correct! I think things will end up with ALL dealers being blacklisted...
Originally posted by StanleyWee View PostI think that most dealers are ethical as long they don't sell fake watches. Most important watch head must be genuine. Some defects is ok lah.
i agreed more healthy thread to share on defects on watches that sellers sell is ok. But to condemn on sellers or to bring down the shop name board is not ethical lah. That is the time Moderators must take actions and close the thread. i support it! If not then ppl will any how condemn sellers and dealers falsely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StanleyWee View PostI think that most dealers are ethical as long they don't sell fake watches. Most important watch head must be genuine. Some defects is ok lah.
i agreed more healthy thread to share on defects on watches that sellers sell is ok. But to condemn on sellers or to bring down the shop name board is not ethical lah. That is the time Moderators must take actions and close the thread. i support it! If not then ppl will any how condemn sellers and dealers falsely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DM101 View PostSo the moral of the story is...... get IT verified @ RSC for $75 then deal
If U do a calulation, $75 is really only 0.88% of the watch if is $8500cHeErS ... Red Devil
Past:
1. Rolex Sub ND (14060M - F series)
2. Ball Mad Cow
Present:
1. Rolex SS DJ (116200 - M series)
2. Rolex TT Blue Sub (16613 - M series)
3. Rolex White Dial Explorer 2 (16570 - V series)
4. Glycine Incursore 46mm automatic
5. Tissot V8 41mm
Future aka Wishlist:
1. PAM (0, 5, 111, 112 or 104)
2. Deepsea
Comment
Footer Ad Widget - Desktop
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget - Mobile
Collapse
Comment