Rolex Sub C LV vs Omega 2011 Ti PO

[hunz]

These are priced roughly the same. The Sub C LV maybe a tad more expensive.

• 3135 vs 8500 movements
• Both ceramic bezels. but PO has LiquidMetal numerics
• Green vs Blue
• Gloss/metallic vs Matte dial
• 904L vs Titanium, and consequently Heavier vs Lighter
• 40 vs 60 hour power reserve
• Steel vs Clear case back
• 1 vs 4 year warranty
• Glidelock clasp vs Standard clasp
• 40mm vs 45.5mm
• "Rolex" vs "Omega" design
• "Rolex" vs "Omega" history/brand
• Rolex vs Omega resale value - if it matters to you

(Please correct me if I have any details wrong).

Ok these are most of the differences, which one would you choose and why?

Head vs Heart decision?

[hunz]

Rolex Sub C LV vs Omega 2011 Ti PO

These are priced roughly the same. The Sub C LV maybe a tad more expensive.

• 3135 vs 8500 movements
• Both ceramic bezels. but PO has LiquidMetal numerics
• Green vs Blue
• Gloss/metallic vs Matte dial
• 904L vs Titanium, and consequently Heavier vs Lighter
• 40 vs 60 hour power reserve
• Steel vs Clear case back
• 1 vs 4 year warranty
• Glidelock clasp vs Standard clasp
• 40mm vs 45.5mm
• "Rolex" vs "Omega" design
• "Rolex" vs "Omega" history/brand
• Rolex vs Omega resale value - if it matters to you

(Please correct me if I have any details wrong).

Ok these are most of the differences, which one would you choose and why?

Head vs Heart decision?

[Supan]

What abt resale ?

[Supan]

resale value maybe ?

[Oceanklassik]

You may get better response if you can post their pics here.

[hunz]

Comparison photos..

[hunz]

um, ok. so the MegaUpload didn't work

[kqxrlovesSpeedmasters]

Sub C LV without a doubt. The Omega PO Ti at 45.5mm wide and 16mm high is a little too big for my tastes. I also prefer round markers to rectangular ones with regards to the dial.

[Supan]

Will it be too thick as well ? I tried several Omega watches but too thick for my skinny wrist!

[wolfeyes1974]

Rolex for sure..

[MsLucifer]

Sub C! why? coz i wan one too!

[Destro22BT]

Although I'll almost always say to go with your heart... this time, it's C-Sub/C-Sub LV for sure. PO-wise... I still find the design is still a little coarse as compared to the C-Sub. Granted, the Ti PO with Liquid Metal+Ceramic Bezel has been touted as Omega's ticket to being a 'true luxury brand' by some, but the C-Sub also comes with a hell lot of enhancements over its predecessor (bracelet, case, u name it).

And most importantly, if u get the C-Sub, wear it for 2 weeks, decide that u like the PO more... selling the C-Sub to get the PO will be less painful than compared to the other way around. A Rolex is still commodity/currency.... can u say the same for Omega? My 2 cents.