Purely looking at $, which do you think is a better option.
a. GMT Master II (8 years) - worn <10times, 95-100% condition.
b. Daytona (<2 years) - BNIB (everything intact).
Suppose their wrist time is going to remain like that for the next 10-20 years, would the realisable market values be less than what they are today?
Oh yes, in my case, its also considering the expected wrist time of Omega/Tag/IWC/Ball would be higher than the 2 above.
Your opinion is much appreciated
a. GMT Master II (8 years) - worn <10times, 95-100% condition.
b. Daytona (<2 years) - BNIB (everything intact).
Suppose their wrist time is going to remain like that for the next 10-20 years, would the realisable market values be less than what they are today?
Oh yes, in my case, its also considering the expected wrist time of Omega/Tag/IWC/Ball would be higher than the 2 above.
Your opinion is much appreciated
Comment