Nav Ad Widget - Mobile

Collapse

Nav Ad Widget - Desktop

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is simply banning them enough? HDB...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is simply banning them enough? HDB...

    Source: http://www.asiaone.com/Business/My%2...03-165485.html



    By Desmond Ng

    HOW'S this for a money-making scheme?

    Rent an HDB flat, and instead of living there, sublet it for nearly 40 times as much as you pay for it.

    That's what one enterprising couple did.

    They rented a one-room flat from HDB at Bendemeer Road for just $26 a month.

    These flats are intended for the poor and needy.

    But instead of living there, they moved in with the wife's parents.

    They then sublet the rental flat to two Nepalese students for $1,000 a month.

    HDB said it managed to recover the flat in February this year.

    The couple have since been barred from renting an HDB flat for five years.

    They are among a growing number of rental flat cheats who have been abusing and profiting from the HDB Public Rental Scheme, which is aimed at helping the poor.

    The number of rental flats taken back surged from 28 in 2007 to a high of 221 last year, said HDB.

    Fewer than 20 flats were seized in 2005 and 2006 each.

    Annual inspections

    In the first half of this year, some 91 flats were recovered. All of them had been sublet by the tenants, said HDB.

    It carries out annual inspections on rental flats to weed out abuse or misuse of these flats.

    The punishment for these rental cheats?

    They will lose the rental flat and will be barred from renting from HDB for five years.

    But are these measures enough to deter such abusers?

    After all, if these rental cheats are able to sublet the flat, it means they do have alternative housing options.

    And one flat taken by an undeserving profiteer means one needy family is deprived of a home.

    There are 4,000 applicants on the waiting list for rental flats and many of them have to wait up to 11/2 years to get one.

    The number of one-room and two-room HDB flats will go up from 43,000 to about 50,000 by 2012.

    Ngee Ann Polytechnic real estate lecturer Nicholas Mak feels that a ban alone is insufficient to deter such cheats.

    He said there must be a financial penalty because these rental cheats are making money out of these subsidised flats.

    Said Mr Mak: 'They are depriving someone else who needs the flat. These are subsidised flats which are indirectly funded by taxpayers. They are indirectly taking money from the taxpayers.

    'HDB should make them pay back the profit they have earned, plus more. If they make $10,000, they should be fined at least twice that amount. This will deter people from doing this.'

    HSR Property Group executive director Eric Cheng agreed that more needs to be done to penalise these cheats but added that fines should only be imposed on a case-by-case basis.

    Need cash

    He said: 'It's usually the older folks who rent these flats from HDB. And some of them may become jobless and in their need for cash, they rent out their flats.

    'It may be illegal but these folks have little choice.'

    Only those with an average monthly household income not exceeding $1,500 are eligible for a rental flat.

    He cited the example of a 60-year-old who was paying $55 for a two-room rental flat but rented it out for about $600 because he was having trouble making ends meet.

    Said Mr Cheng: 'This man works part-time and stays at the coffee shops or workshops that he works at. He's really down on his luck. In this case, it would be harsh to fine him.'

    HDB said that it is in the process of reviewing the penalties for illegal subletting.

    Rental flats for 'truly needy': HDB

    ILLEGAL subletting of rental flats is an abuse of government subsidies meant to help poor households, said HDB.

    These rental flats are heavily subsidised and are meant for truly needy families without other housing options.

    Said an HDB spokesman: 'Only a very small number abuse the Public Rental Scheme by illegally subletting their flats.'

    HDB said it takes a very serious view of this matter and it has stepped up enforcement since 2007.

    'One rental flat that is illegally sublet means one less unit to house a needy family,' said the spokesman.

    'Where there is clear evidence of abuse, we will not hesitate to recover the rental flat and re-allocate the unit to a family in genuine need.'

    HDB advised prospective tenants who wish to rent a flat in the open market to check with an HDB branch office whether it is an HDB rental flat or a sold flat.

    Rental flats cannot be sublet to other sub-tenants.

    If it is a sold flat, the owner can sublet the whole flat after obtaining written approval from HDB.

    In such cases, prospective tenants may request the flat owner to show them a copy of HDB's in-principle approval or approval letter.

    They can also request the flat owner show documentary proof such as agreement for lease or service and conservancy charge or loan statements to verify ownership.

    BARRED FOR 5 YEARS

    JALAN BUKIT MERAH

    A two-room flat was let by HDB to a man, his wife and three children for $44 a month. During a check, HDB found it had been sublet to a Singaporean and three Thai nationals for $1,200 a month.

    The tenant and his family had moved in with his parents. The flat was recovered last November.

    COMMONWEALTH CRESCENT

    A two-room flat was let to a couple for $44 a month. An HDB inspection last September showed it had been sublet to a foreigner for $400 a month.

    The tenant and his wife were living with their daughter on Teban Gardens Road. The flat was recovered in November.

    ANG MO KIO

    A one-room flat was let to a man and his brother for $26 a month. An HDB inspection last November found that it had been sublet to three students from China for $700 a month.

    The brothers were living with a cousin. The flat was recovered in December.

    JALAN TENTERAM

    A flat was let to a woman and her family for $138 a month. During an inspection in July last year, HDB found it had been sublet to a Singaporean and his wife for $500 a month. The tenant and her family were living with her mother at Woodlands.

    The flat was recovered in August last year.
    *****************************
    A bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at the office.


    Just me and my NT...

  • #2
    i dun see anything wrong. If I can secure a daytona at 5k and subsequently sell it at 12k, would my actions tantamount to cheating?

    I believe the income of the household would form one of the criteria for renting one of these 1-rm units. so if a couple is "so poor" as to qualify for such housing facilities, I dun see the evil for profiteering from the lease of the unit.

    There are poor people everywhere in SG. What separates them would be the will to get out of the crap-hole of poverty. Dun see the rationale of relevant authorities recovering the units.
    Remnants of my irresponsibility:
    "Foreign affections"
    1) Sinn U1-30 June 2007
    2) Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 M series-23 Jan 08 (HER perpetual oyster )
    3) Omega Seamaster Chrono Diver 2225.80.00-25 Jul 08 (From Wife )
    4) IWC Top Gun Chrono-20 Sep 09
    What's NEXT?

    Comment


    • #3
      I find tat e HDB are not 'smart' enough to chk e couples background then approve it then so be it.
      "夫君子之行:静以修身,俭以养德;非淡泊无以明志,非宁静无以致远。" - 诸葛亮

      One should seek serenity to cultivate the body, thriftiness to cultivate the morals. Seeking fame and wealth will not lead to noble ideal. Only by seeking serenity will one reach far. - Zhugeliang

      Comment


      • #4
        sounds like a case of dishonesty.

        Cheat HDB and make use of loop hole to profit is considered correct??
        I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes... This is a good example of HDB offering to help poor people... but in return these ppl rented out these houses for their own personal gain...
          *****************************
          A bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at the office.


          Just me and my NT...

          Comment


          • #6
            The scenario may be different again if the HDB is able to impose taxes on those who sublet again.....it is still consider as legal and none cheating??

            Comment


            • #7
              hmm don tink HDB should impose taxes. in the first place, these houses are for the needy. (REAL needy).

              subrenting should not be allowed in the first place. hence, whereforth tax..
              I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch, I dont need another watch.........

              Comment


              • #8
                depends on which side of the fence you are sitting on, that will see what side you take. yes everyone has a sad story to tell, but i feel that public housing should go to those who are in need. of course, they should not be allowed to be in a position to profit from their "disadvantage". Having said that, i see no wrong in subletting rooms out to other people.
                [U]Currently wearing[/U]:
                [SIZE="1"]TT Datejust with diamond dial - sold!
                Blue 6694
                Seiko SD-lookalike[/SIZE]
                [U]"My collection"[/U]:
                [SIZE="1"]Blue 6694; TT DJ w diamond dial.[/SIZE]

                Comment

                Footer Ad Widget - Desktop

                Collapse

                Footer Ad Widget - Mobile

                Collapse
                Working...
                X